Friday, September 04, 2009

model or model?

What does it take to be a model these days? It is seemingly increasing that beauty is the most important factor that makes a model. I don't deny that as a fact. However, is everything in life all about the outer beauty of a person? What about the inner beauty of man? Or the literary beauty of the mind?

Check out the video, and you'll understand why I'm touching on this today.

I find it appalling that a model can have such a weak command of the English language, after being in this harsh education system for at least 12 years. Yes, many of us hail from Chinese educated families, or rather, families that generally speak Chinese dialects at home. However that doesn't give us the excuse to not produce people who can at least speak better, to represent the country, at such a prestigious event. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not the best speaker or writer in the world, however, I'm not here to represent my country in an even that is broadcast for the entire world to see.

That's not the only thing, how about this website? No doubt they're all out to make money, but seriously, "bored in bikinis"?! Do Singaporeans lack creativity to that extent? Some of them are models, appearing on national television, and getting into bitch fights with one another. The drama has really become a trauma for many others. Is being a model just about flaunting assets, if any for some, to woo a crowd? Shouldn't a model be a model for others to follow? A role model for everyone to watch and learn?

I'm not here to say that every single model is an airhead. If you're a model and choose to believe that's my true intentions of this entry, I think you've just proved a point. There are models out there that have bachelors or masters degrees, however what's the point if they are merely degree holders, and not graduates? I find it very sad that many of this is so obviously evident for all to see, yet everyone still patronises them, as if the way they behave is they way to go.

People who are taking part in beauty pageants are generally below the age of 23. Which I guess is far, if outer beauty is all the competition is looking for. However, have they seen enough of the world to be able to be a representative? I know I haven't seen enough of the world, but no one expects a 23 year old to have seen ALL the world. How many of them are actually well-read enough to be able to see the world, without having been all over the world? Yes looks are very important, however, is the brain the most beautiful organ that sets us humans apart from the other organisms that roam this earth? Without the brilliant and beautiful minds of the world, will they be able to stand there and tell the world about 'World Peace'?

No one is perfect, however to educate the people that will follow in our steps, we need to be the model, even if our profession is to model. It isn't the most difficult job on earth, to just pose and have your pictures taken, but it's a lot harder to pose, and let the mind capture the true essence of what's there. The media is so widespread today that even a young child of 7years old has access to every corner of the world, with a mere click of a button. It's not possible to stop every model from polluting the child's mind with rubbish that's not beneficial for growth. However as models, I believe that they can set the standard and be role models for the young, and old alike, to learn and do what's right.

If I had to pick a girl from two, a hot ditsy girl, or a intellectual plain Jane? There's really no guessing on that.

Posted by charles at 12:25 AM

Friday, August 28, 2009

Love for a child

There's a picture on my kitchen wall
Looks like Jesus and his friends involved
There's a party getting started in the yard
There's a couple getting steamy in the car parked in the drive
Was I too young to see this with my eyes?

By the pool last night, apparently
The chemicals weren't mixed properly
You hit your head and then forgot your name
And then you woke up at the bottom by the drain
And now your altitude and memory's a shame

What about taking this empty cup and filling it up
With a little bit more of innocence
I haven't had enough, it's probably because when you're young
It's okay to be easily ignored
I like to believe it was all about love for a child

And when the house was left in shambles
Who was there to handle all the broken bits of glass
Was it mom who put my dad out on his ass or the other way around
Well I'm far too old to care about that now

What about taking this empty cup and filling it up
With a little bit more of innocence
I haven't had enough, it's probably because when you're young
It's okay to be easily ignored
I'd like to believe it was all about love for a child

It's kinda nice to work the floor since the divorce
I've been enjoying both my Christmases and my birthday cakes
And taking drugs and making love at far too young an age
And they never check to see my grades
What a fool I'd be to start complaining now

What about taking this empty cup and filling it up
With a little bit more of innocence
I haven't had enough, it's probably because when you're young
It's okay to be easily ignored
I'd love to believe it's all about love for a child

It was all about love...

I was listening to the lyrics, and this is one of those things that I sympathise with, how sad is it that a lot of this is really true. This is where my heart lies, to help people with these issues.
To you out there who reads this, there are people out there that care.

Posted by charles at 4:57 PM

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Singapore

What does it mean to be Singaporean? Having a pink identification in your wallet/purse? Owning the red colour covered passport? Singing Majulah Singapura everyday in school?

Over the years, the definition of being Singapore has changed from the legal requirements to other less favourable etiquette.

When was the last time you went to a FnB outlet in the Central Business District, and didn't find a packet of tissue paper at the corner of the table? The concept behind it is simply to show that this seat is taken, by a tissue packet no less. Outrageous as it may seem, but it is a rampant practice.

How about when you're out shopping or having dinner at a nice restaurant, and you here a raised voice, "I'm a paying customer!" and a long list of reasons comes out from the mouth on how he/she should be treated.

Remember those days in primary school, going through Civics and Moral Education or 好公民? We were taught to give up our seats to the needy, to give way where necessary, but the way I look at it, it's this generation of youngsters that are not all doing the right thing? Must we really be a typical Singaporean, and be afraid to lose out? There doesn't seem to be much that we stand to gain by being afraid to lose out.

We need to change the mindsets of the younger generation. It's really not just about the giving up of seats, giving way where necessary. There needs to be change to not make the Singaporean an ugly citizen of the world. All this is definitely easier said then done. Everyone needs to play their part I guess. I am merely stating my views, and doing my best to not do any of this. I have to admit, that I am a culprit in some cases too. We're all human, but being human is definitely no excuse. Overtime change can and will take place.

Posted by charles at 6:13 PM

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

captivity



joseph shared this video on fb tonight, and it got me wondering about the recent article in the papers about animal activist against Resorts World Sentosa from keeping a whale shark in their supposed aquarium, that might prove to be the biggest in the world. subsequently the overall debate on whether animals should be held in captivity for the 'entertainment' of people.

i understand the concerns of the activists, not too long ago 2 whale sharks died within 5 months of each other at the georgia aquarium. it's really sad to see such magnificent creatures die because they are in captivity. i feel that it could be worse not having had a chance to see how magnificent they are. i dont think God ever planned for animals to be captured and displayed, as they are in zoos and aquariams all across the world. however He never said that we cant do so either.

is it really cruel to keep them in captivity? yes, no freedom to move around and the ecosystems out there are not balanced once one particular organism is removed from the picture. will it not be easier to study these creatures and find ways to prolong their lives when they're in captivity? no doubt in their natural environment is where they thrive, which would be the best place to study them, but some day, the world's natural habitiats will be destroyed, and the only living specimens will be found in captivity, what then?

how about food? sharks' fin for example. what's wrong with consuming sharks' fin soup? God gave us the birds of the sky, and the fish of the sea, and the animals that walked on land for food. no doubt He didnt say that after we cut off the fins, we throw the body back into the sea, that part i disagree with. and i want to state this first, before i carry on, i'm not some christian extremist that quotes everything from the bible to prove a point. if the said animal is available for consumption, why not? why is it wrong to eat dogs? just because they have been domesticated, and we share a bond between human and dog?

after watching the video, i'm not swayed to think that it's a great idea to have an aquarium and keep a whale shark. in fact, i'm just in awe of the wonders of God's creation, and how sometimes, there are people that are opposed to the things in life that we create, but yet, will never come close to experiencing it anywhere else.

Posted by charles at 12:57 AM

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Child Prodigy

I've never had chills watching anyone play anything before, but this is outrageously amazing.



You can check her out http://www.umipiano.com/index.html

Seriously amazing

Posted by charles at 1:58 PM

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

been thinking about things, and maybe i don't want to try anymore. or maybe, just because i don't know what you want, and don't really wanna sit around and wait to find out.

Posted by charles at 5:19 PM

Friday, May 01, 2009

Male Chauvinist

Hmmm, Carene asked me today if I'm a male chauvinist. I was really taken aback! Never did think myself as one.

Pulled out the following definition from dictionary.com - a male who patronizes, disparages, or otherwise denigrates females in the belief that they are inferior to males and thus deserving of less than equal treatment or benefit.

I definitely do not see the female sex as less deserving of equal treatment. In some aspects some females are less inferior, for example in a physical sense, or when it comes to handy work. However I believe there are things that they can definitely do better than me.

In fact if you ask me, I will sometimes look down on males who I feel are inferior to me. The truth hurts, but that's just me. I really am trying to change that though, to accept the fact that everyone is born with different abilities.

Back to the fairer sex, I do believe that because of some physical disparity between the two genders, females should be accorded better treatment. For example, if it's late at night, let, or make if you must, a guy send or walk you home, don't feel bad or reject the gesture. As they say, "it's for your own good." We, or at least I, believe that you as a girl/female can very well defend yourself when needed, but sometimes it's just difficult against another male figure, who might be twice your size.

Well, if someone really thinks I'm chauvinistic, let me know. It's good to know this kind of things, at least can try to change.

Posted by charles at 12:39 AM